In the current panorama of the discussion on new technologies, the dichotomy of opinions is clearer than ever: some people see technology as a promise of progress and innovation, but one gets the impression that the pessimists are more numerous, or more noisy. And I'm not talking about legitimate concerns, or doubts. There is genuine skepticism, when not fear and rejection.
What fuels this feeling towards new technologies? And how can society balance hope and realism in looking to tomorrow?
Roots and reasons of the pessimists
The growing skepticism towards new technologies is not a new phenomenon, on closer inspection. Every technological revolution, from printing to the industrial revolution, has had its detractors. There are many reasons for pessimists:
- Excess of promises: New technologies are often presented with a set of promises (some of them really great) which, at least initially, are not kept. This can lead to disappointments and growing distrust.
- Social impact: Emerging technologies can lead to significant changes in the fabric of society, often resulting in unemployment or changes in working patterns. This can fuel resistance and worries.
- Limited understanding: Not everyone has a thorough understanding of new technologies. This lack of understanding can lead pessimists to have unfounded fears or a distorted view of potential and risks.
Technological optimism
On the other side of the debate, there are those who see a bright future thanks to new technologies. The "tech optimists" make several points:
- Exceeding current limits: Technology has the potential to solve problems that currently seem insurmountable, from the energy crisis to incurable diseases.
- Potential for inclusiveness: New technologies, especially those related to information and communication, have the power to democratize access to information and create more inclusive societies.
- Continuous innovation: History has shown us that technological innovation is a continuous process. Even if some technologies don't live up to their initial promises, others emerge and lead to unexpected advances.
The drifts
Keeping promises, realizing potential, finding balance
It is essential to strike a balance between pessimists and optimists. It is not possible to dismiss all criticism as a conspiracy: it is healthy to question and critically evaluate new technologies. It is equally important, however, to remain open to the potential that these technologies offer, and those who have an optimistic approach are not a sucker ready to be enslaved by the "powers that be". Artificial intelligence hysteria it is only the latest example of how a possible technological breakthrough becomes chicken coop material.
The key lies in education and understanding: providing people with the information and tools they need to understand new technologies and their potential impacts helps balance enthusiasm and lucidity.
Pessimists and optimists, one remedy: turn up the volume of listening
The debate on the future and role of technologies is complex and multifaceted, but it feeds on an "excess reaction": too little listening. There is a rush to praise any novelty, or on the contrary to consider it absolute evil. We do not need these extremes if we want the future to remain largely in our hands.
With education, dialogue and open-mindedness, we can shape a future where technology serves humanity, not the other way around.
