Near future
Contact us
  • Home
  • Tech
  • Health
  • Environment
  • Architecture
  • energia
  • Transportation
  • Spazio
  • AI
  • concepts
  • Gadgets
  • Italy Next
  • H+
July 5 2022

Coronavirus / Russia-Ukraine

Near future

News to understand, anticipate, improve the future.

No Result
View All Result

News to understand, anticipate, improve the future.

Read in:  Chinese (Simplified)EnglishFrenchGermanItalianJapanesePortugueseRussianSpanish

No, Google's AI is not sentient

AI is often praised for its continued growth. This week, however, things have taken a decidedly 'creepy' turn

Gianluca Ricciodi Gianluca Riccio
in Technology
Share74Pin18Tweet46SendShare13ShareShare9
PERISCOPE COVER 23
June 14 2022
⚪ Reads in 5 minutes
A A

This post is part of “Periscopio”, the Linkedin newsletter that explores future future issues every week, and is published in advance on the LinkedIn platform. If you want to subscribe and preview it, find it all here.

The Washington Post last Saturday reported the statements of a Google engineer suspended on June 6 for violating the Palo Alto company's confidentiality agreements. In essence, the engineer, Blake Lemoine, has spread "private" chats between him and an artificial intelligence chatbot that would demonstrate something rather feared by many experts: this AI would have become sentient.

These are strong statements from an industry expert, not just any guy. And they are rendered after hundreds of interactions with a cutting-edge and unprecedented artificial intelligence system called TheMDA. But it's true? Has this AI really become sentient?

sentient artificial intelligence
Is the MDA sentient?

What are we talking about

LaMDA stands for “Language Model for Dialog Applications”. It is one of those AI systems that can respond to written requests when trained on large volumes of data.

Maybe you are also interested

Mr.Shadow, the song composed by the AI, I like it a little and it worries me a little

Microsoft will (without haste) withdraw its technology that reads emotions

Petvation: door with facial recognition for pets

Are we ready for mind-controllable bionic body parts?

Systems have gotten better and better at answering questions by writing in ways that are more and more human-like. Just last May, Google itself presented LaMDA on his official blog defining it as “capable of writing on an infinite number of topics”.

Yes, but is it sentient?

After the claims of the engineer, Google tried to throw water on the fire, denying the interview that appeared in the Washington Post. "Our team," Big G wrote yesterday, "examined Blake's concerns and informed him that the evidence does not support his claims." Several artificial intelligence experts echoed it: some have soundly rejected this thesis, others have used it as an example of our propensity to assign human attributes to machines.

A bit like when we fight with the mouse, so to speak.

It is not a joke, however. Such a thing cannot be dismissed like this. And not for the fears of people like Ilya Sutskever ("AIs are becoming sentient"), Yuval Harari ("AI will be able to hack people"), Or Mo Gawdat ("AI researchers play at creating God").

The belief that Google's AI can be sentient is very important, because it highlights both our fears and our expectations about the potential of this technology.

Yuval Harari
Yuval Harari

For now, however, it is a mistaken belief

The development and use of advanced and trained computer programs on huge amounts of data raises many ethical concerns. In some cases, however, progress is judged on what could happen rather than what is currently feasible.

The conclusion at the moment, according to almost all the major computer experts in the world, appears to be only one: no, Google's AI is nowhere near sentient. She's just better at looking like it, pairing language patterns with similar things she finds in an almost infinite store of sentences.

You have to imagine it as a super powerful version of the autocomplete software we have on a smartphone. Ok: super super super powerful. However, no one should confuse this with being sentient.

The very AI developers, however, are playing the charge these days, alarming people. Their statements, dictated in part by the shock of seeing the potential of this technology first and in part also to promote them, have a great resonance in the media.

Google's AI is not sentient

Last week Blaise Aguera y Arcas, vice president of Google Research, wrote in an article for The Economist that when he started using LaMDA last year, he felt more and more like he was talking to something smart. It is understandable astonishment, even subtle fear.

At the moment, however, LaMDA has undergone 11 different review processes on the principles of artificial intelligence. She has also been subjected to many tests on her ability to come up with fact-based claims. Anything. It is not sentient.

This does not detract from the need to develop artificial intelligence following ethics and morals. Someone, to tell the truth, says to have developed an AI directly EQUIPPED with a morality, but that's another matter.

The main duty of researchers, if they really care about the progress of this technology, is not to anthropomorphize its manifestations. Above all, do not overly alarm the public, if anything by remaining vigilant to be able to "pull the brake" as soon as there is actual evidence of a spark of self-awareness.

IF there ever will be. What do you say?

tags: googleartificial intelligencePeriscope
Previous post

Arena of the Future, Stellantis tests the road that recharges electric vehicles

Next Post

Tidal flow 'biomimetic' turbine produces energy by mimicking fish

COLLABORATE

To submit articles, disclose the results of a research or scientific discoveries write to the editorial staff

    archive

    Have a look here:

    football of the future
    Advice

    The football of the future

    What will the football of the future be like? Let's take a look at the next few years of the sport (it was a game) more famous ...

    Read More
    sweat sensor without withdrawals

    Analysis without blood sampling: the patch inspired by the cactus "reads" the sweat

    Farm of the future in a Russian short: cyberpunk, but not too much

    Farm of the future in a Russian short: cyberpunk, but not too much

    Experts warn: don't fall in love with a robot. The story of Jibo

    Experts warn: don't fall in love with a robot. The story of Jibo

    The eye of the drones is copied from insects

    The eye of the drones is copied from insects

    The daily tomorrow

    Futuroprossimo.it provides news on the future of technology, science and innovation: if there is something that is about to arrive, here it has already arrived. FuturoProssimo is part of the network ForwardTo, studies and skills for future scenarios.

    Subscribe to our newsletter

    Environment
    Architecture
    Artificial intelligence
    Gadgets
    concepts
    Design

    Staff
    Archives
    Advertising
    Privacy Policy

    Medicine
    Spazio
    Robotica
    Work
    Transportation
    energia

    To contact the FuturoProssimo editorial team, write to [email protected]

    Chinese Version
    Édition Française
    Deutsche Ausgabe
    Japanese version
    English Edition
    Edição Portuguesa
    Русское издание
    Spanish edition

    This work is distributed under license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International.
    © 2021 Futuroprossimo

    No Result
    View All Result
    • Home
    • Tech
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Architecture
    • energia
    • Transportation
    • Spazio
    • AI
    • concepts
    • Gadgets
    • Italy Next
    • H+